Brave New Feminist World

Feminists (of both sexes) are unable to compete on equal terms with men in a variety of areas and therefore resort to dirty tricks to pull men down to their own level. But what feminists do not know (or don’t want to admit) is that men’s and women’s genetic coding differs a lot from each other. Women’s natural care and consideration are primarily aimed at her own children but also to other children and even alleged “children”, even if they grow a beard, have wrinkles, or have grey hair. The main object of empathy for men on the other hand is the group as a whole, but he still directs special attention to women, and in particular to his own woman.

Historically, men’s primary task has been to protect the group, to provide the group with food, and to lead the group to new hunting-grounds. All of these tasks require extensive planning, risk assessment and impact analysis. Women’s tasks are also important but they do not normally require any substantial analytical thinking or any far-sightedness to speak of. Therefore, it creates severe stress in many women when they force themselves to perform typically male jobs that require male thinking and acting.

Yesterday I met a lady cemetery worker who raked leaves at Pålsjö cemetery. By chance we came to discuss these differences in male and female traits when suddenly she said: “That might explain why so many career women end up here, in this serene environment, looking after the graveyard!” You can’t say that women lack the capacity for logical thinking after that statement, can you? 🙂

A large proportion of all women are normally gifted and the proportion with lower or higher intelligence is relatively small. A slightly smaller proportion (compared to women) of men are normally gifted, but a greater proportion (compared to women) of them are also either less or more talented. The “less” manifests itself in crime statistics and the “more” in the list of Nobel laureates over the years.

The feminist experiment that we have been subject to for decades can be compared to the Cultural Revolution in China in that known facts about man and society completely are disregarded or simply denied.

Feminism – a threat to Western society

Early in the development of man, children became a prerequisite for the tribe’s survival and had to be protected and trained throughout their long growing-up period in order to become useful resources for the common good. This upbringing task was quite demanding and forced a specialisation where the female’s physical and mental characteristics were adapted to take care of and protect the child during its early years while the male’s qualities were developed to fulfil the task of training and guiding especially their male offspring when the child grew a bit older.

Female empathy and concern thus is primarily focused on the woman’s own children and secondly on the children of the tribe, while for a man the primary empathy and concern goes to the group as a whole, especially to the women, and in particular to his own woman.

The above observations are important as they render the political will to reach an equality in outcome a hopeless project. If a woman follows her biological programming then it makes it impossible for her to have a super career that follows the male model because her genetical programming tells her to give priority to the children above all. She might choose to disregard this fact but then she will probably feel so mentally uncomfortable that she is forced to take to all kinds of physical and mental substitutions to compensate for her unnatural behaviour. A feminist society like the one we see in Sweden today is thus not at all optimal for the majority of women in Sweden or anywhere else in the world. On the contrary, it might very well be the explanation for increased burnout in women and teenage girls’ increased mental ill-health in the world’s most feminist country.

However, the feminist “value-foundationTM” sect in Sweden have a different explanation and will argue that inequality in outcome is due to the Western man oppressing the woman (and ethnic groups from other cultures) and to hidden (white, male) power structures in society.

Exposed to this aggressive claim, men of power tend to yield because men as a group regard women as a prioritised object of concern and empathy. But if this behaviour continues it will eventually lead to a change of the male focus of attention from focusing on the best possible outcome for the group by using planning, consequential analysis, adaption, cooperation, and capability, to a focus on individuals, nursing and “everyone’s equal valueTM“.

Swedes and assimilated immigrants experience to their great horror that none of those in power really cares or even understands that there are problems. All that is produced are platitudes and useless symbolic actions instead of taking powerful action to stop the countless rapes, shootings, and blasts, and to stop islamic terrorists from coming and going as they please, and to put an end to mass migration of people who never will be able to support themselves in the Swedish society. And not at least take measures to stop the decay in our welfare systems, in our legal system, and in the social apparatus which has been kidnapped by feministic activists.

The problem is that feminists (women of both genders) primarily have children as their primary empathic objects (their own and others’) together with everybody else that they can claim are vulnerable and cannot take care of themselves or are treated unfairly by white men (Afghan beardchildrenTM, transgender people, Muslims etc). But they definitely have no empathy for other women or for the oppressive, disgusting white “cis” male who they blame for all evil that has happened in the world at least since the late 1400s.

Unlike the male who, in order to protect women and children, targets his aggressiveness outward, against the invaders and against those within his own group that creates problems, the feminists focus their aggression inward against “white men” in their own group who have not adapted to the rules and conventions of the feminist sphere. Some women’s outrage is therefore not about the ubiquitous unsafeness in the Swedish society and the numerous rapes, which they instead try to cover up as best they can and make weird excuses for, because feminists do not have other women as objects of empathy. Instead they attack the white males’ incorrect use of language and clumsy physical contact patterns, which is well illustrated by the metoo-disaster.

Another thought is that the main representatives of the feminist “value-foundationTM” ​​consistently ignore planning, risk assessment, and impact analysis. For example, the impact that mass immigration might have on Swedish society has never been investigated in depth. Do they not want to know for fear of what the result might be? Is it because of the demands from feminist sect morality? Probably but there might also be a more plausible explanation.
The answer may be revealed by the fact that women historically have been responsible for the inner sphere that contained family-related activities and that didn’t require a very extensive planning and it didn’t have a lot of uncertain parameters. This implies that no deeper risk assessment or impact analysis was required from women.
Planning regarding the outer sphere (that was governed by men) on the other hand comprised the whole group and contained activities like hunting, defence and group movements and therefore held more parameters of which many were uncertain, and that required a higher degree of foresight and also a firmer hierarchical organisation, based on competence and ability.
On the other hand it might be that simple that the advocates of the feminist “value-foundationTM” are not interested in planning, risk analysis, or impact assessment as long as there is the slightest possibility that the result clashes with what this infamous “value-foundationTM” dictates.

The people who lived in Europe during the ice age survived thanks to their adaptability and their ability to cooperate and make plans, and this is probably the explanation for that the advanced Western culture originated in Europe shortly after the ice age. Perhaps it is also the desire to cooperate and the lack of jealous guarding of territory that is the explanation for why the northern man does not react when the global power elite wants to steal his habitat through mass immigration of people with completely different survival strategies.

The high crime rate that comes with the immigration from MENA and Sub-Saharan countries could possibly be better explained as genetically conditioned than as culturally conditioned. Namely, aggression as a survival parameter works better in dysfunctional, populous states and cities in warm areas where people tend to have low confidence in society and with each other, than on the ancient sparsely populated steppe in central Europe.

Political Correctness In Sweden

Politically correct Swedes seriously believe that those who do not share their views to one hundred percent have been indoctrinated and manipulated when in fact it is the politically correct ones who have fallen into that trap!

The decay of the education system with increasingly poor educators and teachers, through politicised syllabuses and prepared study material has made it very difficult for the students to get a true picture of Sweden and the Swedes of today and in the past unless the individual student is actively seeking fact-based information.

The politically correct have also got the strange idea that just because something has its origin outside Sweden we must not call it a Swedish tradition. And if a tradition is relatively new, there is no tradition at all!

They also defend the criminal acts of other cultures in the present (Muslim slavery activities, for example) with the fact that we in the Nordic countries did the same thing 2000 years ago!

These political commissars will never give up their beliefs whatever it leads to. That we can see not least from the batik witches’ stubborn defence of their Afghan toy-boys. Not even when their “boys” rape the daughters and murder the political correct friends of these women.

What do we do about this insanity?

Can Contemporary Germans Forever Be Held Responsible For Violations Committed Against Jews During The Nazi Era?

Every time Jews in Germany suffer an attack from one of the extremely few, often alone acting, white extremists who goes all the way and really uses ultra-violence against Jews, the Jewish press (Haaretz, October 10, 2019, for example) immediately and like a parrot asserts that contemporary Germans have a “historical responsibility” that the holocaust never is given a chance to repeat itself.

Nonsense. Contemporary Germans haven’t more responsibility for what their crazy fellow countrymen do to Jews than today’s Jews have for the killing of God’s son by their ancestors 🙂

Dead Aid, Or The White Man’s Debt To Africa

The type of aid that mainly the Western world has been practising in Africa since the 1950’s (aid that is based on the same model as the Marshall Plan) has strongly contributed to that many African countries, especially the sub-Saharan countries, have been stuck with poverty, corruption and stagnation, and have been forced to face an endless line of civil wars and countless omnipotent, insane, and greedy dictators.

The only “good” that this aid has brought about in Africa is that more people survive nowadays, but that’s only because of Western medicine and technology that the Africans have been given “free of charge” by the Europeans, but for which we ourselves (mostly white men) have spent countless hours and huge amounts of money and other resources for centuries developing, and for which we have been forced to make big sacrifices. We have overcome countless obstacles on the way and we have carried on even when our own lives were put at risk.

In addition, many Africans can now scrape together sufficient resources to leave their “shithole countries” for good, something that definitely does not benefit the Europeans. The Western world first pours unlimited amounts of destructive monetary aid into the states of Africa hoping that someday they eventually shall be able to take care of themselves, without demanding that the rest of the world pick up their bills. But instead, as a “thank-you for your kind help”, we now have to provide for them for life even in Europe and be forced to live with the adverse effects of their often islamic clan cultures with a high rate of violence, crime and unemployment. And as if that isn’t enough they also refuse, and are even encouraged to do so, to adjust to the ways of Western society.

Africa’s development compared to Asia’s is like the difference between night and day and an important part of the explanation for this big difference can be found in how foreign aid has been conducted by the rest of the world in Africa, but cultural and genetic explanations of course weigh even more heavily. Reading tip: “Dead Aid” by Dambisa Moyo.

The Multicultural Experiment in Sweden

45 years after the famous decision was made in the Swedish Parliament (1974) that Sweden would henceforth be a multicultural society without any requirement for assimilation of immigrants, it is easy to say that there are two cultures (religious groups) in the world that when they move to another cultural sphere requires special treatment and privileges that no other group would even think of demanding. Of course, I’m talking about Jews and Muslims.

Excerpt from the department of YLE (Finnish State Broadcasting Company) broadcasting in Swedish. The feature is titled “How Sweden became multicultural”:
“The father of Swedish multiculturalism, David Schwarz, found that assimilation was not possible for the Jews in Sweden. One could not let Hitler win, assimilation would be to give the Nazis victory posthumously,” says Wickström, who in his research has studied Schwarz’s thoughts and deeds.

The Swedish rabbi Dan Korn still seems to fully agree with Schwarz in 2019 despite the fact that the multicultural experiment must be considered to have derailed already in the eighties! Schwarz’s initiative and politicians’ vanity have instead created havoc in Swedish society. Dan Korn’s notion is strange not least considering that Schwartz later realised that he was grossly complicit in creating a terrible beast that would inevitably cause great difficulties for Sweden to survive as a welfare nation or even to avoid becoming a so-called “failed state” , where the government has completely lost control of the state of affairs. However, Mr Schwarz himself escaped the worst consequences. He died in 2008.

The multicultural experiment in Sweden is a brilliant example of what self-righteous politicians with grandiose self-image can bring to work without the slightest thought of the consequences. But it would never have gone this far unless their irresponsible ideas had been uncritically and fully backed up by an uneducated, history-less, group-thinking journalist mob who either lives on state press support or, as is the case with journalists employed by the three companies that constitute Swedish state broadcasting, are paid directly by the state .

Swedish For Immigrants

Many people who have the experience of acquiring skills that are equivalent to at least “effective operational” level (B2+) in a foreign language know that teacher-led education can be useful for beginners, but it is not a success factor for effective language learning at higher levels. Only the pupil himself can bring the most important prerequisites to make that happen: will, motivation, discipline, a stubbornness bordering on phobia, and a lot of spare time. It is a monumental task to acquire such a practical knowledge of a language that it becomes reasonably useful at work and in all other environments and situations you might end up in during your waking time.

Very few of nowadays immigrants to Sweden are sufficiently successful in acquiring the skills needed in the Swedish language to make them employable (neither in the private sector nor in the public), or to function at all in the Swedish society without requiring expensive (paid for by taxpayers) interpreter services. When faced with this problem Swedish authorities and politicians always suggest that more of the same is better. Therefore, as a rule, they suggest more teacher-led language education to address this “issue”. But, “Swedish for immigrants” is only useful at a very basic level and to offer unlimited quantities of it does not change that fact, it only wastes taxpayers money.

Better to send the low-skilled and poorly motivated immigrants back to their native countries where they know the culture and the language and where they have the skills needed to get a job and to function in society. Let’s face it: most of them will never be able to support themselves in Sweden anyway. Not a chance. The shortage of staff and resources in health care and other parts of the welfare-industrial complex would then disappear or be greatly reduced due to the fact that our dear immigrants as a group over utilise many of our common resources but doesn’t deliver their share of the skilled personnel needed to keep things going at a reasonable level.

A recurring mantra from immigration activists is that Sweden needs immigrants because the Swedish population is getting older as a whole and that not enough babies are born to keep all systems going in the near future. But low-skilled “replacements” isn’t a solution, it only makes things even worse as the immigrants themselves also get older for every second, and they bring in their old relatives and their non-working women to Sweden as soon as they have been granted their residence permit.

There is a hump a bit high up right now in the Swedish age pyramid but it will disappear all by itself in a couple of decades. People die you know and the bump consists mainly of the many people that were born as a result of the euphoria immediately after WWII. In the meantime Sweden will have to pay a bit more for keeping our elders safe and sound but that could easily be done by reducing migration of unskilled people to a minimum and redirect the hundreds of billions saved to more useful areas and to reduce the Swedish tax pressure that for nearly fifty years has been among the highest in the world.

Scandinavian Airlines System Raises Ticket Prices “For The Climate”

The world’s biggest scam ever – the imminent climate threat! IPCC was formed with one objective, and one objective only, to burn into the brains of the western populations (primarily) that the CO2 that is released as an effect of human activity forms an imminent threat to life on earth although there isn’t any indisputable scientific evidence that supports that theory. But oddly enough, many people seem to believe in IPCC’s assertion anyway and the reason for that is probably because neither system media nor the Establishment allow any debate. “Science is settled” they say in order to refuse and avoid all forms of open and serious debate on climate change matters!
This “naivety” (read stupidity) among big groups of people gives businesses like Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS) a golden opportunity to raise their prices “for the sake of the climate”. Other unscrupulous companies and organisations make loads of money by selling “environmental certifications” of products and processes, and the European politicians (in the European Parliament and in the national parliaments) have created costly, and totally unnecessary processes for “emissions trading” (sic!) in order to fleece end-consumers and taxpayers. Are we really that easy to fool or are we just plain cowards that dare not protest against this obvious and monumental folly?

It’s a gas…

“Dry air contains 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide and small amounts of other gases. Air also contains a varying amount of water vapour, on average about 1% at sea level and 0.4% in the whole atmosphere. ” [Wikipedia, Atmosphere of Earth]

In other words, carbon dioxide accounts for 400 parts per million, ppm, of the total number of molecules in the Earth’s atmosphere.

300 of these 400 ppm has been there for a long time and it is not likely that this good old amount all of a sudden should begin to have an adverse effect on our climate when it hasn’t had that for many centuries.

Of the 100 ppm that has been added since the 1950’s, man can be “held responsible” for only 15. The rest comes from natural processes in the biosphere and in the oceans.

15 ppm corresponds to an increase of 1 or possibly 2 CO2 molecules for every 100 000 molecules in the atmosphere.

People that claim, with certainty, that CO2 emissions linked to human activity are severely damaging the climate and therefore are a direct threat to our common future thus also state that one or two CO2 molecules determines the temperature of nearly 100,000 other molecules. If that would be the case, CO2 must be an extremely powerful gas with properties unknown until lately.

The same people also argue that humans can “stop climate change”. All we have to do, they say, is to end all our carbon dioxide-generating activities once and for all. They also believe that this must be done quickly and that no price is too high to “save the planet”. The result of such a fast shutdown though would be sky-high for the world economy and for individuals. Many times higher electricity prices and unreliable electricity production depending on unpredictable weather would quickly preclude much of that which we in the Western world nowadays take for granted.

Absolutely nothing supports that climate threat extremists are right and absolutely nothing speaks for that world leaders should listen to and take seriously what screeching, rude, emotional, ignorant, and mentally disturbed youngsters are hollering about in this matter. This issue is far too important for that, but it is also too important to be handed over to opportunistic, populistic and stupid politicians.

Jeremy Clarkson (The Sun) strikes back at Greta Thunberg for her violent attack on civilisation and on grown-ups that refuse to take UN and IPCC alarmism seriously until evidence backing up the theories is presented. Instead of evidence, reality tells us that the discrepancies between the map (IPCC’s theories) and the terrain (noticeable reality) increases for every year and have done so since the creation of this entirely political climate change sect that has one clear objective only: to rule the world in order to “save the planet” from what white Europeans have done to it since at least the fifteenth century.


Sweden, a cocky little country on the outskirts of Europe that got stuck in its image of being a humanitarian superpower and therefore could get away with letting itself being invaded by millions of uneducated bums from dysfunctional clan based cultures from all over the third world – without being forced to pay dearly for decades to come for its mistake. This can only be explained using expressions like bottomless naivety, narcissistic leadership with fully developed hybris, and total ignorance of the differences between cultures, and a folly that will be hard to match ever.