“Go Set a Watchman” – an (unwelcome) contribution to the race debate

The novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” was published in 1960 and was embraced by much of the American progressive establishment that used it as a bat in the debate over racial discrimination. Set in a small town in the American South, the story is a white, middle-aged lawyer who later gets a black man acquitted of rape charges from a white girl. Other main characters are the lawyer’s boy-girl-daughter and a son, she is around 10 years old and he a few years older.

This was the author Harper Lee’s first book and long was also thought to be the only one. But in 2015 came as “Go Set A Watchman” which was not a sequel as first thought but turned out to be a first draft of “To Kill a Mockingbird”. Many passages of text overlap in both books.

The big difference is that the plot of “Go Set a Watchman” takes place twenty years after the plot of “To Kill a Mockingbird”. It also turns out that the kind-hearted lawyer is skeptical that it is possible to grant all blacks full civil rights overnight. The Civil Rights Act did just that in 1964 and the lawyer believes it was a mistake. He does not believe that the blacks are mature enough to deal with all this freedom at once and that it will cause major problems in society going forward. The daughter, on a visit to her birthplace, who from childhood has worshipped her father as a god for his upright stance, especially on the issue of race, is now forced to take a stand for what she herself thinks for the first time in her life instead of being blindly led by the father’s actions and opinions.

“To Kill a Mockingbird” was very politically correct in 1960 as it is also today while “Go Set a Watchman” definitely isn’t. The book received a very cool reception when it was published and was not noticed at all in the same way as its predecessor, despite the fact that the prose is of the same high quality and the plot is interesting. This reveals a lot about our postmodern, twisted present where posturing and virtue flashing trumps facts and reason.

The Truth Behind The Swedish Success Story

The Social Democrats ruled Sweden from 1932 to 1976, 1982-1991, 1994-2006 and are again in government since 2014. In several elections in the 20th century, the party received more than 50% of the vote and a number of votes below 30% has always been considered a disaster by party members.

The Social Democrats claim that it was they and their policies that enabled a poor peasant society, as Sweden was until the 20th century, to develop into a modern welfare state and a forerunner in less than a hundred years.

However, that’s not in accordance with the truth.

The turning point for the sparsely populated country in the north came with the free trade reforms introduced under the leadership of the liberal Finance Minister J.A. Gripenstedt in the latter part of the 19th century. Furthermore, 1.2 million Swedes emigrated to North America from 1846 to 1930. 200,000 of these later returned to the motherland after a shorter or longer period abroad, and some even made the journey across the Atlantic back and forth several times. An important part of Sweden’s success story is thus to be found in the frequent exchange of information that took place between the emigrants in America and their relatives and acquaintances back home in Sweden. Inventions, ideas and phenomena that arose in the large, dynamic country in the west came to public attention in Sweden quite quickly and led to new methods being introduced and new companies being started. Among those who returned to Sweden, some had had great success and brought with them venture capital, viable business ideas and know-how that they used to start new businesses. Among these were the founders of virtually all the large, multinational Swedish industrial companies that still exist today. Such as Ericsson, AGA, ASEA and CA Johansson, the latter with their measurement kits were basically the one that enabled Henry Ford and others to start mass-producing goods with completely interchangeable parts.

What you have read so far in this text happened long before the Social Democrats were given any power to talk about and are therefore not to their credit in any way.

Sweden was “neutral” during the two world wars, leaving the Swedish production systems completely intact, while the rest of Europe was shattered and after the end of the war they were in dire need of everything. Swedish industry was in high gear and had no problem selling everything they produced. You just couldn’t fail and the Social Democrats didn’t have to do anything at all.

After the end of the Second World War, the party began to devote itself more and more to improving the world, not least through the work of Gunnar and Alva Myrdal and the United Nations, and they were very proud that Sweden, through Dag Hammarskjöld, was able to fill the secretary-general post of the UN after Tryggve Lie.

In the 1960s, other nations had already caught up with Sweden, but instead of encouraging Swedish industry to prepare and adapt to the future, the Social Democrats were now increasingly involved in expanding the Swedish welfare systems in order to “take care of” the population from cradle to grave. This engulfed huge amounts and taxes were therefore quickly pushed up to very high levels. In addition, the public sector expanded enormously and bureaucracy swelled over all the banks.

Although (not because) the Social Democrats were in power all the time, it still went quite well until 1970, around the time when the first oil crisis struck. The total madness broke out in 1974 when the Riksdag adopted amendments to the Constitution which stated that people from all over the world in principle should have the unconditional right to enter and stay in Sweden. In the 2010s, another amendment was adopted by the Riksdag which states that it is racist and punishable by law to deny that multiculturalism is beneficial for any nation. This whole idea that multiculturalism is something good and desirable can be derived from the thoughts of Olof Palme and a certain David Schwarz who greatly influenced Palme to push through that Sweden should be a multicultural nation. Multi-ethnic wasn’t good enough for the jew Schwarz who much later realised that he had created a monster that doesn’t stand a chance anywhere in the world.

So far there are no signs that common sense is on its way back. Instead, it is now imposed on us that coloured people should have privileges over whites at all times because our white ancestors allegedly have committed grave atrocities against indigenous peoples all over the world since the dawn of time. No account is taken of the circumstances and perceptions that prevailed at the time of the alleged crimes, but everything is assessed by the current politically correct yardstick. It’s complete madness!

But our postmodern establishment seems to have missed an important point and that is that other people’s money doesn’t last forever. One day we are standing there in the rubble of what once, for a few decades in the 20th century, was perhaps the world’s best country to live in and wonder what happened. The answer is that it was socialism that happened: an authoritarian, opportunistic, cruel ideology completely unrooted in reality and without any decency whatsoever.

Climate threat – the battle for truth

Many adults interpret Greta Thunberg’s doomsday prophecies as indisputable facts from “science”. All I hear when she rages are factoids, lies, slogans, and mantras without any kind of relevance to actual science, delivered with ice cold, calculating shrewdness. Blind faith without a shred of common sense or will to take into account any different opinion what so ever.

This will go completely out of hand if we do not shape up and move on to a mature discussion on what is true and what is not, what is likely to happen, and what we ought to (can) do in order to protect ourselves. Those who ruthlessly use the hysterically debauched youth cult as a tool to destroy the Western way of life will not step back voluntarily. The Marxists have been at this for a hundred years and they will continue until finally either we or them bites the dust.

Inform yourself broadly so that you can shape your own idea of how right or wrong the climate threat believers really are. The IPCC’s compilations are politicised pamphlets designed to influence the establishment so forget about that, and the alarmists “own” system media so you have to find other (“alternative”) sources as well in order to get a reasonably balanced and unbiased picture.

Use your search-engine wisely and you will find loads of well-founded information that totally contradicts the cocksureness of most climate-alarmist assertions.

The welfare industrial complex

One of the main obstacles to any real change in Swedish migration policy before it is finally, relentlessly, forced by the circumstances, is spelled “the welfare industrial complex”.

Many Swedes and “new arrivals” have been made dependent on the taxpayer-funded welfare industrial complex for their livelihoods, either as nursing objects or as employees. Therefore, this monster is entirely dependent on the fact that imports of needy, helpless, resource-intensive problem children from dysfunctional cultures continue and increase to create employment for a rapidly growing “Swedish” population with just as fast declining competence and declining ability to perform any productive tasks at all.

But as Hans Werthén, a heavyweight in Swedish industry, once said: “We can’t make a living on washing each other’s shirts”

Reading the Koran to understand how Muslims think

The Koran (Quran) is virtually impossible to understand if you read it just like any other book. It makes it at lot easier to take advantage of what other Westerners have come up with through hard work. American Bill Warner is a man who has made it his mission to educate anyone that might be interested in what Islam really stands for in our time. Through his foundation, he publishes a number of booklets that briefly and in plain language deal with the fundamentals of Islam: the Koran, the Hadiths, Sira and Sharia.

Bill Warner’s booklets are available from Amazon. Start by reading “A Two-Hour Koran” to get an overview of what Islam is all about.

You should also get yourself a copy of danish psychologist Nikolai Sennels’ book “Holy Wrath – Among Criminal Muslims”, a real eye-opener from the inside of Danish inpatient youth care that makes you realize what it is we’re up against in Europe and in all the non-Muslim world. Also available from Amazon.

Regarding alleged obstacles to the expulsion of Islamists from Sweden

Recently, six radical imams were released after being detained on the Swedish Security Police’s order because they are considered a real and permanent threat to Sweden’s national security. The reason why they were released is stated to be that they cannot be deported to their home countries because they could be ill-treated there and that this is supported by the UN Refugee Convention.

It is true that the UN Refugee Convention in Article 33 paragraph 1 stipulates that deportation must not be carried out “if the individual’s life or freedom is threatened” but at the same time, paragraph 2 of the same article stipulates that individuals who are considered a threat to the security of the nation or who have committed another serious crime does not have the right to state the reasons listed in paragraph 1!

Thus, it is a shameless lie to say that under no circumstances should it be possible to expel extremists despite the fact that the person “may be ill-treated” in the countries to which they are expelled.

UN Refugee Convention, Article 33:

  1. No Contracting State shall expel or return (‘refouler’) a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
  2. The benefit of the present provision may not, however, be claimed by a refugee whom there are reasonable grounds for regarding as a danger to the security of the country in which he is, or who, having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of that country.

It is probably this section (2) that Denmark successfully uses to expel “its” extremists from Danish territory and none other than the usual suspects have complained so far. However, the Swedish Justice Department, the Migration Agency, the judiciary, journalists and parliamentary politicians choose not to see section 2 as it contradicts the “sacred” value base of the “humanitarian great power” and thus does not fit in the image of Sweden as a humanitarian and infinitely tolerant paradise and ideal society.

Abolish Feminism!

I recently read an article in a Swedish blog critical of society that claimed that it was high time to repeal the law that says Sweden should be multicultural and put Swedish values first once again. In a comment I wrote that I thought it was a good idea but that the first thing to do was to abolish feminism as a state religion in Sweden. But unfortunately that is not enough, female voting rights, at least at younger ages, also has to go.

A couple of weeks before the Swedish parliamentary election 2018, party sympathies looked like this among women 18-29 years: Center Party: 18.3% Left Party: 17.8% Social Democrats: 15% Moderates: 14.6% Environmental Party: 13.4% Sweden Democrats: 6.8 % Liberals: 4.7% Christian Democrats: 4.5% Feministic Initiative: 3.6%.

72.8% of Swedish women 18-29 years stated then that they were going to vote in favour of the same political parties that had plunged Sweden into an uncontrollable, violent, lawless swamp because of the politicians’ totally insane passion for uncontrolled migration and the mantra “everyones’ equal value”(TM)

But if laws that targets the “climate threat” can be passed, so can laws against the significantly greater threat – feminism – an ideology that goes in contradiction to everything that evolution has encoded in our genes since the beginning of time. Nature has no overriding political motives. Only survival applies and for that reason mammals and almost all other creatures are divided into males and females that have qualities that complement each other and that make 1+1 add up to 3. But that is not good enough for feminists. They will not be satisfied until they have grown coc*s and all men have turned into mindless poofs.

Brave New Feminist World

Feminists (of both sexes) are unable to compete on equal terms with men in a variety of areas and therefore resort to dirty tricks to pull men down to their own level. But what feminists do not know (or don’t want to admit) is that men’s and women’s genetic coding differs a lot from each other. Women’s natural care and consideration are primarily aimed at her own children but also to other children and even alleged “children”, even if they grow a beard, have wrinkles, or have grey hair. The main object of empathy for men on the other hand is the group as a whole, but he still directs special attention to women, and in particular to his own woman.

Historically, men’s primary task has been to protect the group, to provide the group with food, and to lead the group to new hunting-grounds. All of these tasks require extensive planning, risk assessment and impact analysis. Woman’s tasks are also important but they do not normally require any substantial analytical thinking or any far-sightedness to speak of. Therefore, it creates severe stress in many women when they force themselves to perform typically male jobs that require male thinking and acting.

Yesterday I met a lady cemetery worker who raked leaves at Pålsjö cemetery. By chance we came to discuss these differences in male and female traits when suddenly she said: “That might explain why so many career women end up here, in this serene environment, looking after the graveyard!” You can’t say that women lack the capacity for logical thinking after that statement, can you? 🙂

A large proportion of all women are normally gifted and the proportion with lower or higher intelligence is relatively small. A slightly smaller proportion (compared to women) of men are normally gifted, but a greater proportion (compared to women) of them are also either less or more talented. The “less” manifests itself in crime statistics and the “more” in the list of Nobel laureates over the years.

The feminist experiment that we have been subject to for decades can be compared to the Cultural Revolution in China in that known facts about man and society completely are disregarded or simply denied.